打通“大动脉”,畅通“微循环” 物流行业正快速恢复******
物流业一头连着生产、一头连着消费,在市场经济中的地位越来越凸显。随着疫情防控政策不断优化调整、各地“年货节”购物活动带动,物流行业景气度正在快速恢复。物流快递企业信心十足,连接千城百业、畅通供需,更好服务经济社会发展、便利百姓生活。
打通“大动脉”,畅通“微循环”,物流行业正快速恢复
2022年12月20日下午,北京市经开区大琛科技园顺丰公司兴业街速运营业点内,快递员们忙个不停。快递车装满包裹后快速出发,驶向不同送货地点。
经济发展,物流先行。近期,随着疫情防控政策不断优化调整,全国各地加速复工复产、复商复市,医疗物资、生产原材料以及重点民生商品的跨区域转运和末端配送等物流需求大幅增加。为打通“大动脉”、畅通“微循环”,各地区各部门打出保通保畅的组合拳,按下物流复苏“快进键”,推动行业逐渐恢复向好。
交通运输部充分发挥国务院物流保通保畅工作领导小组办公室作用,会同国家邮政局及各成员单位加强统筹部署和跟踪调度,强化部门协同和部省联动,全力以赴做好医疗物资运输保障各项工作。
国家邮政局要求,当前要确保药品等防疫物资的投递,特别是农村地区医疗和民生物资的投递,满足节假日期间旺盛的寄递需求。干线运输不能停、末端网点不能关,落实“保供应、保畅通、保稳定、保安全”。
外地快递员驰援、开启“夜派”模式、发放额外补贴……从干线运输到末端揽派,不少物流企业亮出真招实招,保障物流顺畅。
美团配送通过设置“疫情关怀金”、强化骑手健康保障、设置康复补贴等方式,加速恢复城市末端配送运力。闪送积极调拨运力,加大社会面招募力度,鼓励闪送员延长递送时间。满帮集团优先保障药品、防疫物资、食品等运力需求,畅通流通渠道,确保重要物资有车运、运必达。
“目前全国大部分地区堵点卡点已有效疏通,物流行业正快速恢复、有序运行,为支撑经济社会发展提供了有力支撑。”中国物流与采购联合会研究室主任周志成说。
发展信心强,行业韧性强,2022年快递业务量比上年提前7天达到千亿件
“2022年邮政快递业面临多重挑战,但业务发展取得新的突破,快递业务量比2021年提前7天达到千亿件,充分彰显了行业发展的强大韧性。”国家邮政局邮政业安全中心数据管理处副处长许良锋说。
近年来,各地相关部门进一步落实减税降费、松绑减负等政策,持续深化“放管服”改革,进一步优化快递物流企业经营环境,推动行业快速发展。
快递进村拓展服务。“短短半个月,我就卖出了8000多斤果子。”河南省南阳市西峡县五里桥镇封店村村民黄春侠说,自从村里开了圆通快递驿站,可以实现当天采摘当天发货,自家的猕猴桃销量翻了两番。国家邮政局数据显示,全国建制村快递服务覆盖率已达90%。
快递进厂提质增效。江苏省常州市的天合光能股份有限公司内,一辆辆装载着光伏产品的高栏车按序驶离厂区。“我们为企业量身推出包装方案,提供铁质立体货架,每片组件都由聚氨酯材料卡槽固定,耐得住日晒雨淋,能有效保护产品。”顺丰运输(常州)有限公司项目负责人刘康说。
快递“出海”稳步推进。在云南省瑞丽市畹町口岸,中通国际东南亚管理中心冷链部门负责人汪立宝忙着给15.2吨康乃馨鲜切花办理通关手续,不到1小时,这批鲜花已完成了所有的通关手续。“多亏了中通推出的全程冷链运输模式,运输过程零腐烂,4天就能到达泰国曼谷。2022年我们订单量上涨了20%。”昆明斗南鲜花市场商人王宇说。
周志成介绍,2022年全年社会物流总额超过330万亿元,物流业总收入近12万亿元,交出了一份来之不易的成绩单。新的一年,随着保通保畅成果持续巩固,行业景气指数将进一步攀升,快递物流业有望持续恢复向好。
完善流通体系,创新服务模式,扩内需不断取得新实效
当前,各地区各部门积极引导物流、快递、商贸流通等企业下沉服务,加快贯通县乡村电子商务体系和快递物流配送体系。
创新流通业态和商业模式,更好满足县域居民需求。
临近年关,河北省张北县玉狗梁村村民正忙着备年货。相较于以前跑大老远去购物,如今他们只需在手机上“一键下单”,商品就能送到家门口。2022年6月,在村干部支持下,美团优选自提点开进村里,村委会妇女主任孙俊仙当上自提点店长,她说:“村里现在啥都能买到,从葡萄、火龙果、鱼罐头,到螺蛳粉、火鸡面,手机上一下单,第二天就收到了,真方便!”依托“中心仓—网格站—自提点”三级仓配链路优势,美团优选已覆盖全国2000多个市县,其中超过一半自提点位于乡镇。
发展共同配送项目,加快消费品下行。
早上8点,浙江省松阳县共配中心内,拥有280个格口的自动化分拣系统高速运转,快递车运来的数万件包裹进入同一条分拣线,快速精准地落入对应的格口当中。一个环形分拣线最少拥有上百个格口,这套自动化分拣系统能精确解析快递地址,将包裹对应分入格口,根据需求分到村一级。截至目前,菜鸟乡村已帮助全国上千个县域4000多家快递物流企业建设农村快递物流智慧共同配送项目,平均降低综合运营成本30%至50%。
加大智能物流技术下沉,助力农产品上行。
如今,伽师新梅成为不少消费者的“心头好”。2022年8月,京东物流为新疆维吾尔自治区伽师县引入12条智能分选设备,打造了集果品采购、冷藏、加工、分选、包装、物流为一体的产地智能供应链中心,使当地新梅的分选效率大大提升,促进产业升级。
专家表示,要加大政策扶持与资源倾斜,鼓励物流企业坚定信心、敢闯敢试,发展专业化农产品寄递服务和冷链仓储加工设施,不断完善“物流+农村电商”的合作服务模式,深入挖掘农村市场,让扩内需的举措不断取得新实效。
中新网评:处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称,将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对,企图将核污水“一倒了之”,把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
2011年,福岛核电站事故发生后,大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋,对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害,数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日,作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由,在2021年4月13日,正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多,日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称,这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全,甚至“可以喝”,这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上,经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质,核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收,长期来看,将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁,最终危害人类健康。
因此,核污水排海计划推出后,遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示,福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中,约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场,反对该计划。
日本政府认为,核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案,但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海,核污水会随着洋流流动,其影响势必会跨越国界,危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称,相关研究认为,福岛核污水如果排放入海,约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域,该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告,若日本将所有核污水排入海中,不到半年,整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁,包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国,有义务保护海洋环境。然而,在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上,日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估,但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论,并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下,日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设,这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道,日本必须正视各方合理关切,在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后,制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远,若只顾眼前,执意将核污水排放入海,不仅其自身,周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单,其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
(文图:赵筱尘 巫邓炎) [责编:天天中] 阅读剩余全文() ![]() 乐发彩票地图 |